Recovery, controversy over the distribution of funds against early school exchanges. Criticism of Bianchi by the leaders of the South and also by “his” committee of experts

In the “Ristori” school of Forschett (Naples), the man who visited Analisa Durante when she was accidentally killed by a gun, the manager Stefania Colicelli does everything and more for tear the children off the street. Looking for resources everywhere, he has created a pact for reading for the zero-six range “because prevention is done there”, he is trying to build a center for children. But from the funds of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan against you Dispersion crut keen Cent. So at Tor Bella Monaca, at the “Francesca Morvillo” institute, where this year the money for the Summer Plan (which was not allocated last year) but nothing came of the NRP. At the Institute “Villaggio Prenestino” in Rome there are many migrants, many refugees and certainly not children of notaries and doctors – says the principal. Giusy Ubriaco – but all this was not enough to get the long-awaited funds.

These are just a few of the Thousands of schools who are not on the list of those who receive the resources. A plan of 1.5 Billion: the first 500 million (assigned in these days) goal to fund projects and 3,198 schools with students aged 12-18; the rest should go to the schools of other school years. They went to the Center Nord 244 million, to the south 256. To define the methods of distribution of funds is the Ministerial Decree 170 of 24 June last. The document is clear: the 500 million are divided on the basis of criteria, calculated on the latest data Istat available at regional level: early exit rate from the education and training system in the age group 18-24; Number of students first and second grade secondary school in the reference region; Rate of Presence of the foreign population; Rate of Population without diploma High school in the age group between 25 and 64 and many families. The resources, which are then distributed on a regional basis, comply with the rate criteria Fragility of learning calculated byInvalsi and the number of students enrolled in the educational institution.

Indicators that do not fit many principals and others, so much so that a storm has broken out. Against the Minister of Education Patrizio Bianchi many principals stood on the spot, who remained in control of the match but also the working group appointed by the Minister himself to give indications of dispersion, the Mayor of Naples Gaetano Manfredi and Regional Counselor for the game Elena Fortini. Two were also sent to the Viale Trastevere parliamentary questions: one of Sandro Ruotolo and the other of Victory HouseChairman of the Chamber of Deputies Committee on Culture, Science and Education, recently Luigi Di Maio.

In particular, the writers criticize the plan. Valeria Sentili it is clear: “It is absurd that there are schools in the historic center of Rome that are attended by social classes that are very different from my students who received the money. An example: the national boarding school. The criterion cannot be that on paper. There is a separation with reality, whoever is in the ministry does not know. The manager states the criteria identified: “With us, the dispersion rate is not high, but because we invent everything to break it down”. Hearing her and her teachers for the toughest kids came up with a plan ad hoc lessons: they go to school with personalized courses “but they need funding for pay these teachers and if they do not get there … “.

Colicelli is also surprised: “I am waiting for enlightenment. We are in difficult territory. I am a funding catalyst. In our city, Bianchi has also signed an education pact with the bishop and other subjects, but all of that risks being spread now.” The schoolteacher tries in every possible way to keep the boys at school: she has even invented one Training course with dogs, but that PNRR money would have served. Criticism also comes from the political leaders of the Campania capital. Councilor Fortini sot a The morning: “Those working against dispersion have been excluded”. The mayor announced that he would call Bianchi. To shake hands with colleagues, Ubriaco said: “In recent years, I have been forced to pray for a Enrichment from my school’s education offer. It is discouraging to see that thousands of euros have been donated to schools in the center of the capital and not to us who are literally on the move. They say that among the criteria there are Invalsi Data but the numbers regarding my school have improved (and thankfully) but they still remain at a low level. So it makes no sense to try to bring a suburban school to par with one in the historic center? Non-dispersion rates should not be monitored in the social context. “

Scontenta is also number one at Lycée “Majorana” in Spinaceto: “No appreciation to our principals, but at least they would listen to us. We need a service conference that allows us to discuss”. Meanwhile, the committee he himself had involved in this affair went into shooting against Bianchi. Ludovico Albert, the former Deputy Minister Marco Rossi Doria, the teacher Franco Lorenzoni, Andrea Marmiroli, Vanessa Pallucchi, Don Marco Pagniello and the Sociologist Chiara Saraceno they sent a letter to the Ferrara professor, in which they spoke of “excluding very difficult schools” and of a decree “distributing resources but not defining who, what and how they use them”. According to experts, the guidelines regarding territorial alliances to combat inequalities were not taken into account and there was a simplification of the criteria for the task. According to Rossi Doria and the others, the frequency of Students with special educational needs and the presence of young people No.

He does not forgive the Minister, not even himFlc Cgil as by his National Secretary Francesco Sinopoli She immediately heard: “The allocation of NRP resources to contrast dispersion is wrong in method and substance. 500 million euros divided into around 3000 schools, without the participation of those who work in the school every day , no dialogue with the unions and, we learn, no consideration of the same indications appointed by the working group appointed by Bianchi. “Sinopoli is particularly vocal:” A distribution of resources without one Preventive Context Analysis of the schools and of the needs and derived from their concrete and autonomous planning, which will determine the exclusion of whole school communities for years to counter the phenomenon of dispersion in particularly exposed neighborhoods and geographical areas “.

The only one who distances himself from the only criticism of the minister is instead the president of the National Association of Judges, Antonello Giannelli: “Another billion euros are on the way. There is a lot of money for everyone, if at all, planning is necessary to manage it. Anyone who needs to say something about the criteria would have done it already, not now. In 170, they are well defined.

Leave a Comment